Grewal, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. 'Schwab claimed that the amount of cash in its robo-adviser portfolios was decided by sophisticated economic algorithms meant to optimize its clients’ returns when in reality it was decided by how much money the company wanted to make,' said Gurbir S. Schwab made money from the cash allocations in the robo-adviser portfolios by sweeping the cash to its affiliate bank, loaning it out, and then keeping the difference between the interest it earned on the loans and what it paid in interest to the robo-adviser clients. Schwab advertised the robo-adviser as having neither advisory nor hidden fees, but didn’t tell clients about this cash drag on their investment. The subsidiaries agreed to pay $187 million to harmed clients to settle the charges.Īccording to the SEC’s order, from March 2015 through November 2018, Schwab’s mandated disclosures for its robo-adviser product, Schwab Intelligent Portfolios, stated that the amount of cash in the robo-adviser portfolios was determined through a “disciplined portfolio construction methodology,” and that the robo-adviser would seek “optimal return.” In reality, Schwab’s own data showed that under most market conditions, the cash in the portfolios would cause clients to make less money even while taking on the same amount of risk. We believe that cash is a key component of any sound investment strategy through different market cycles,” the statement said.The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged three Charles Schwab investment adviser subsidiaries for not disclosing that they were allocating client funds in a manner that their own internal analyses showed would be less profitable for their clients under most market conditions.

“We are proud to have built a product that allows investors to elect not to pay an advisory fee in return for allowing us to hold a portion of the proceeds in cash, and we do not hide the fact that our firm generates revenue for the services we provide. issued a statement saying it was “pleased to put this behind us” and noting that it resolved the issue “years ago.” “Schwab’s conduct was egregious and today’s action sends a clear message to advisers that they need to be transparent with clients about hidden fees and how such fees affect clients’ returns,” he said.Ĭommenting on the settlement, Charles Schwab Corp. “Schwab claimed that the amount of cash in its robo-adviser portfolios was decided by sophisticated economic algorithms meant to optimize its clients’ returns when in reality it was decided by how much money the company wanted to make,” said Gurbir Grewal, director of the SEC’s enforcement division, in a release. They also agreed to a censure and to retain an independent consultant to review their policies and procedures relating to their robo-advisory disclosures, advertising and marketing. agreed to pay approximately US$52 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, and a US$135-million penalty. and Schwab Wealth Investment Advisory Inc. Inc., Charles Schwab Investment Advisory Inc.

Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the firms - Charles Schwab & Co. “Schwab advertised the robo-adviser as having neither advisory nor hidden fees, but didn’t tell clients about this cash drag on their investment,” the regulator said. The SEC alleged that Schwab made money from the cash allocations in its robo portfolios by sweeping clients’ cash to its affiliate bank and profiting on the lending spread.

Charles schwab